WASHINGTON (AP)– President Donald Trump said Friday he is strongly considering launching “Illegal Immigrants” into Democratic fortress to punish congressional opponents for inaction on the border– just hours after White House and Homeland Security authorities insisted the concept had been declined as fast as it had actually been proposed.

” Due to the fact that Democrats hesitate to alter our very dangerous immigration laws, we are undoubtedly, as reported, offering strong factors to consider to positioning Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities just,” Trump tweeted. He added that, “The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this must make them really happy!”

The turnaround, which appeared to capture authorities at the Department of Homeland Security off guard, came as critics were blasting Trump for the supposedly-rejected concept, implicating him of turning migrants into pawns to pursue his political challengers. It comes as Trump has grown progressively exasperated by a rise of Central American migrant households crossing the southern border and is trying to find new ways to press congressional Democrats to change laws that he insists are making the issue worse.

Indeed, recently Trump urged his soon-to-be acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan to seal the southern border and told McAleenan he would pardon him if he were to find himself in difficulty for obstructing legal asylum-seekers, according to two people familiar with the conversation who spoke on condition of privacy to describe a private exchange.

It was unclear whether the president was joking, and a Homeland Security spokesman stated in a statement: “At no time has the president indicated, asked, directed or pressed the acting secretary to do anything prohibited.” The reported conversation came during the president’s trip last week to Calexico, California, a day after he announced he was delaying his risk to close the border because Mexico seemed stepping up its enforcement efforts.

Prior to Trump’s tweets on Friday, both the Department of Homeland Security and a White Home authorities had actually insisted in nearly identical declarations that the sanctuary-cities strategy had been floated however then flatly turned down.

But not, obviously, by the president, who emphatically revived the concept.

Inquired About it by press reporters, he said he was “strongly taking a look at” launching migrant households into those neighborhoods.

” They’re always saying they have open arms. Let’s see if they have open arms,” he said.

There were no indications, nevertheless, that authorities were taking any actions to move on with the idea or thought about the president’s words anything more than bluster.

” Sanctuary cities” are locations where local authorities do not comply with Immigration and Customs Enforcement authorities, rejecting information or resources that would help ICE assemble for deportation people residing in the country illegally.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says rounding up immigrants and shipping them to sanctuary cities is

House Speaker Nancy Pelosit was inquired about reports that the White Home thought about sending immigrants to sanctuary cities. (April 12)

They include New York City and San Francisco, home city of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who on Friday called the idea “not worthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the difficulties that we face as a country, as a people, to resolve who we are– a country of immigrants.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, who chairs your house Homeland Security committee, said it “acts as a reminder that the Trump administration’s negligent migration agenda is not about keeping the country safe, but about partisan politics and wantonly causing cruelty. “

The concept of pushing immigration authorities to accept the plan was discussed in November and after that once again in February as the Trump administration had a hard time with a surge of migrants at the border, according to three individuals who spoke on condition of privacy to describe personal conversations. Homeland Security and ICE lawyers rapidly rejected the proposition, according to the individuals, on the grounds that it was made complex, too pricey and a misuse of funds, two of the people said.

The strategy, which was initially reported by The Washington Post, is among a litany of ideas being considered by an increasingly anxious White House in recent months. Authorities state they are lacking options, and have actually proposed and recycled many ideas that have never ever concerned fruition. Trump in recent weeks, for circumstances, has talked about the concept of renewing his administration’s questionable household separation policy– even as he’s openly declared he will not do that– and has threatened to entirely seal the border despite opposition from many in his administration.

There have actually been at least two variations of the sanctuary city strategy gone over: One to move people who have actually already been detained to locations with Democratic opponents of the president, the other to transport migrants apprehended at the border directly to San Francisco, New York City, Chicago and other areas.

ICE arrests individuals in the U.S. unlawfully and also manages migrants who present themselves at border crossings and request asylum.

The rise of migrant households at the border has been taxing the system, and ICE says it no longer has actually the resourced to deal with immigrants processed by the Border Patrol. As a result, more than 125,000 individuals have actually been launched as they await court hearings– a practice Trump has derided as “catch and release.”

With immigrant processing and holding centers overwhelmed, the administration has actually already been busing people numerous miles inland and releasing them at Greyhound stations and churches in cities such as Albuquerque, San Antonio and Phoenix.

Transferring large groups of immigrants to remote cities would be a lot more costly for an agency already strapped for cash. Flights chartered by ICE expense about $7,785 per flight hour, according to the firm, and require multiple staffers, consisting of an in-flight physician. The firm likewise uses business flights but requires that migrants to spend for those.

At the very same time, many “sanctuary” communities would likely welcome the immigrants in question. Some of these cities have robust networks of not-for-profit legal groups that might assist them strengthen their legal cases to remain.

The Department of Health and Human being Providers said today it had begun hunting uninhabited homes that might be developed into facilities for holding migrant kids in numerous cities, including Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, and San Antonio.

Those facilities would be certified by each state and most likely take a number of months to be approved and opened, separating them from the rapidly broadening emergency shelter at Homestead, Florida, and the now-closed camping tent facility at Tornillo, Texas.

The Defense Department has actually also been examining a number of military bases to find an area that can house up to 5,000 unaccompanied migrant children as the U.S. braces for a surge of people crossing the U.S.-Mexico border this spring.

Under the Trump administration, ICE has significantly stepped up arrests, including of individuals who have no U.S. criminal records. In response, some cities have actually gotten rid of ICE from prisons where representatives might quickly get migration lawbreakers. Authorities in New York City, Baltimore and Seattle rarely, if ever, reveal information about when believed lawbreakers in the U.S. unlawfully will be released from custody.

Democrats have said they will deal with immigration expenses, potentially as quickly as they return from their spring recess, and Senate Republican politician leader Mitch McConnell has shown an interest.

___

Associated Press authors Nomaan Merchant in Houston, Astrid Galvan in Phoenix and Lisa Mascaro and Deborah Riechmann in Washington added to this report.

Check Out the Original Post