Stuyvesant High School, New york city City’s most prominent secondary school, just confessed 7 black students for the upcoming fall term. Asian trainees comprise 73 percent of the trainee body.

According to a report from theNew York Times, Stuyvesant High School just used admission to seven blacks trainees this year for their incoming 900- seat freshman class. This news has triggered argument throughout the political spectrum, with figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez chiming in.

Maggie Haberman of theNew York Timesargued that white trainees dominate secondary schools like Stuyvesant since they can pay for to get ready for its entryway test. Nevertheless, this isn’t exactly real. NBC News reported in 2018 that Asian-Americans comprise 73 percent of the trainee body at Stuyvesant. Furthermore, all of the New york city City schools that accept students based on the SHSAT test are “bulk minority.”

White students usually have more means with which to prep for this test, some doing it for years. Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equivalent playing field. https://t.co/2s0TwkKwHV

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) March 19, 2019

” White students usually have more suggests with which to prep for this test, some doing it for several years,” Haberman composed on Twitter. “Yes it’s a test, no it is not an equal playing field.”

Peter Kauffmann, the former representative for Senator Hillary Clinton, explained to Haberman why she was painting an insufficient photo. “But white students aren’t the ones getting in. It’s mainly low-income Asian kids,” Kauffmann wrote in a tweet.

I’m talking about the system as an entire, not Stuy. Thanks!

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) March 19, 2019

” I’m speaking about the system as an entire, not Stuy. Thanks!” Haberman replied. But Kauffmann quickly recognized that Haberman was attempting to avoid admitting that she was incorrect. “

I thought by “this test” you implied the SHSAT,” Kauffmann wrote, referring to the test that is utilized as an entrance exam for eight New york city City high schools.

Shockingly, Haberman then tried to make it appear like Kauffmann was uninformed on the problem. “Yes I do,” she wrote. “You know it is not simply for Stuyvesant.”

Yes. And the SHSAT schools are bulk minority, with a higher proportion of lowered lunch kids than any of the screened, non test high schools. I agree that K-8 education in New York City is broken, I just don’t think focusing on 8 schools that serve 2%of kids is going to solve anything

— Peter Kauffmann (@PeterKauffmann) March 19, 2019

” Yes,” Kauffmann continued. “And the SHSAT schools are bulk minority, with a greater proportion of decreased lunch kids than any of the screened, non test high schools. I agree that K-8 education in NYC is broken, I simply don’t believe fixating on 8 schools that serve 2%of kids is going to fix anything.”

After understanding that she had spread misinformation, she dismissed the whole exchange with a one-word response. “Cool,” she tweeted.

Cool.

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) March 19, 2019

Several users slammed Haberman, who has actually won a Pulitzer Prize, for her dismissive action and rejection to admit that she was incorrect.

” I’ve long been a fan and have enjoyed your work, but this reaction makes me question the accuracy of whatever you have actually written,” one user wrote. “If you do not accept realities when you slip up, how can I trust your reporting?”

Stay tuned to Breitbart News for more updates on this story.

Read the Original Post